
Reading up to page 100 seemed to be very short when I started reading King Leopold's Ghost. But after getting into the book, it proved to be a great stopping point. Starting the book off with a man running away from himself was very admirable. I found myself liking this "John Rowlands" or later known as Henry Morton Stanley, for this reason. People in his situation have rights to make their lives better for themselves and because of his expedition Stanley did just that. Stanley was definitely the hero of the book, traveling, sightseeing and living his life the way he saw fit. His writings are what I enjoyed most. He seemed to like writing about his journey's, historical facts and current news, but his passion was rooted in fiction. To every account he wrote there was some sort of passage or elaboration that he added to make his writing even more juicy and intriguing. His tales of the war, and especially his journey to find Livingston were elaborated but reading them I fully enjoyed his tales. Apparently people on the American shore liked his writings too, because he soon became a "must read" section of the papers in New York. Later in the book the character King Leopold came into the story.


Later this characteristic comes up again when he is fighting for land rights of the Congo. He plays with the minds of England, France and Germany, hoping that they all fall victim to his master scheme. Unfortunately for them, it works and they all go along with his rise to dominance.
1 comment:
It's odd, since Leopold was royalty I waved off all his flaws and blamed it on the position in life but took more issue with Stanley making things up. I did not see my own person bias until I read your post.
Post a Comment